Across languages, major prosodic boundaries, such as intonational phrase (IP) boundaries, are typically signalled via final lengthening, pitch change, and pause. However, the relative weight of each cue in both production and perception is different across languages. Little is known about IP boundaries in Dutch. This study investigates cue-weighting in the processing of IP boundaries in Dutch by examining the effects of varying combinations of cues on the neurophysiological correlate of boundary processing, i.e., the Closure Positive Shift (CPS). Thirty native speakers of Dutch listened to a name sequence, connected by the coordinating conjunction en (‘and’), i.e., Moni en Lilli en Manu. By leaving out one cue at a time, we have found that the CPS response was similar when listening to boundaries marked by all cues, boundaries marked by two cues missing pitch rise, and boundaries marked by two cues missing final lengthening, indicating that pitch rise and final lengthening have a relative small weight. In contrast, the CPS response was absent when listening to boundaries marked by two cues missing pause. These results indicate a crucial role for pauses in the adult processing of IP boundaries in Dutch coordinated constructions.